
Sunday, May 1, 2011
It may not be what it seams...

Friday, October 29, 2010
HARK, THE HERALD ANGELS SING
Monday, July 19, 2010
IT IS LIKE A MIRACLE!

I had surgery a week ago and have been taking it easy at home, recovering. I am astounded by the healing abilities of the body. Immediately after the operation and in the three days following, I was convinced that I would not survive. But then I turned the corner and the pain began to lessen. And all of this happened while I sat and watched. I did nothing to facilitate the process. We are simply and miraculously programmed to rebuild. Until we are not.
During the fourth of fifth night of curling myself protectively over my own abdomen in my chair in front of the TV, I answered the phone and was informed that I was a semi-finalist in a $50,000 home makeover contest. Normally, I would have simply said I was not interested and hung up the phone. But perhaps due to boredom, or due to the drugs languishing in my blood, I began to question the voice on the other end of the line.
We had already established that I was indeed Cheryl (pronounced chair-rail) Hicks, but I had to explain two times to the voice that I had not entered a contest before he found the place in his script where he assured me that sometimes one’s name simply becomes available for such contests on the internet. “It is like a miracle.”
Perhaps that is what made me continue to question the voice.
“Where did you get my name and phone number? Who do you work for?”
“Yes, well, the identity of the principal of the organization at the immediate top of the corporation is… “ (and here I lost track of my ability to listen. I am still unsure whether this was due to the painkillers or the abundance of prepositional phrases, but I do recall that the entity itself had something to do with Yahoo.)
The voice assured me that I was immediately eligible for some $200 worth of gift cards and all I had to do was… (again, this requirement of action, even in the abstract, caused my brain to shut down momentarily).
I asked a couple more questions and each one was followed by, “Yes, well…” (sound of shuffling script pages)… and a surprisingly forthcoming answer. I began to suspect that solicitors were not allowed to lie.
Suddenly the game was no longer challenging for either of us, and the voice asked, most politely, to speak to Mr. David Hicks. Even as I assured him that Mr. David was also not interested in his generous offer, I was thinking about the identity attached to the voice and about the nature of commerce that bubbles just under the crust of our information driven society often undetected, at least by those like me who live fairly sheltered lives.
Somewhere, probably on the other side of the planet, a human being spent several hours each day/night dealing with people like me and people unlike me. Some would be rude. Some would be delighted by their luck. Some would realize that this might be the best job available to the voice right now and that it was important for his job security for him to conclude each call as efficiently as possible.
I wondered if the voice got any credit for keeping me on the line a few extra seconds or if he was penalized somehow when these seconds did not lead to a successful conclusion. I wondered what I would do if the only job I could get was talking to strangers on the phone for hours at a time about things most of them did not want to talk about.
I said, “Thank you , but I am not interested,” and hung up the phone.
I repositioned myself physically and wondered about the organism that is our planet, the combined cultures, economies, policies, oil spills, earthquakes, personalities, frailties, talents, technologies, vices , visions and voices that make up the world community. And I wondered if there was any hope that she still had the ability to heal herself.
Wednesday, July 7, 2010
Saturday, July 3, 2010

HOW YA LIKE ME NOW?
I have started a new self-portrait. I try to make myself do one annually, but some years I avoid the whole self-reflective process. Today I was thinking of some of the most famous self-portraits I have seen. Frida Kahlo, Vincent VanGogh, Chuck Close… It is no coincidence that these three artists have greatly influenced my portraits.
The thing about a self-portrait is that it makes you look at yourself if a different way. I may put on make-up every day (okay, maybe not every day in the summer), and it makes me realize that looking in a mirror is different from looking at a photograph. It is sort of the same thing as hearing your voice in person as compared as to hearing a recording of your voice. It can be almost unrecognizable! For example, one day I called my house to talk to my husband and when he was not there, I left a generic message on the answering machine. Something along the lines of, “Hi. It’s me. I’ll call back later.” Now, I am a little embarrassed to admit that later that day when I came home and played the message on the machine, for a brief moment I did not recognize my own voice and thought for just a moment that my daughter had called. This can be attributed to the fact that I am a little goofy, that my voice sounds a whole lot like my daughter’s voice, and that the voice one hears in a recording is just different from the voice that resonates out of one’s own head. And the whole thing reminds me of how many ways I am out of touch with my true self.
I don’t know why artists tend to recreate themselves. I do know that I have never painted a self-portrait with the intention of selling it. And yet, with the exception of one self-portrait that my husband wanted to keep, I have sold all of the ones I have painted. Perhaps artists paint themselves because the subject is readily available. Perhaps it is due to vanity. Perhaps it is a form of soul searching. My instincts lean toward the latter.
My face has changed a lot in the ten years that I have been painting. I jokingly told my daughters one day recently that my face is collapsing. But really, it was no joke. The plump parts that once made my cheeks perky and my face heart shaped have begun to slump. I can only imagine them going a bit further south each day, moving steadily and irretrievably toward the land of Jowldom.
As an artist I always appreciated a beautiful face. As a fifty-year-old woman, I am learning to appreciate the marks life leaves on one’s countenance. When I look at my face these days, I see a strong resemblance to my mother. My relationship with Mamma was not always ideal. As a writer I have tapped into this vein repeatedly. As an artist I am just beginning to do the same thing. When I notice that my mouth is shaped somewhat like hers, I remind myself not to say hurtful things to people. When I realize that my eyes are large like hers, I realize that in many ways I am still an innocent. And as I have learned to be a little gentler with myself, I have learned also to cut my mother a little slack.
A few years ago I started a series of poems titled Conversations with the Virgin. Of course, it goes without saying that these poems are a spiritual exploration, but they are also an attempt to reconcile my negative feelings for my mother with the need to embrace my own femininity. The two poems below are from this series:
FULL PARDON
Lady of Luminous Laughter,
I know you look down on me
and wonder at my stupidity,
that you must marvel at my inability
to appreciate the wonder that saturates my life.
Prone to melancholy, sometimes
I pretend that my tears are born of glee
and that the sudden lurching snap
that jerks me toward the earth’s hot core
is natural, even desirable.
Sometimes I confuse you
with the young Cambodian woman
who runs the cash register at the liquor store,
so determined to pull from me
some detail of my day, yet always willing
to pay me for my reluctance
with patience
with her boundless exuberance,
with her predictable reassurance,
with these four simple words, “You are so beautiful!”
Sometimes you remind me of my friend Kat,
(You know, the one with the tumor?)
and the way she looked at me that day
and how with a smile that lifted only
the left side of her face, she said simply,
“You have a beautiful life.”
Sometimes my face turns hot
and my shame grows unchecked,
blossoming uninhibited in my chest
until almost no oxygen remains and
all I can think is that I should have
visited Mamma before she died.
Then, I imagine you there, in that otherworldly place,
with your arms crossed gently over your breast,
holding your veil, soft against your face
and floating toward the ceiling
where, with only the occasional silent smile,
you rain peace and understanding from the rafters.
AND BY THE FACT ITSELF
Lady, my thoughts of you are as thin
as the skin on the back of my hands.
The star in my lucid dreams you are
and it seems that I can’t even take a phone message
without automatically adding a reference to you.
Holy Mother, I once read
that those wishing to control dreams
should spend their last minutes of life
each night studying the backs of their hands. You see,
and I know you do, that our hands are the things
we see more than others,
more than other objects,
more than other expressions, digressions…
more than thoughts throughout our waking sessions.
Ip
so
fact
o
when we see them in our sleep,
our deep subconscious minds design scenarios
in which they’re able to function. And so
sound dreamers function in their sleep.
But Lady, my eyes weep tears of blood
as slumber goes
the way of wonder,
the way of distant thunder born of memory,
the way that gender
only begins to explain
the differences between our legs, and so we run
and run and run like dogs asleep,
and never still, we keep
the sacred pacts of childhood.
Today I look at my face
and I see your smile.
Tuesday, June 15, 2010
ANATOMICAL POETRY

Wednesday, June 2, 2010
WHAT HAPPENS TO POETRY?
I spent a lot of time with Diane Ackerman today. Okay, not actually with her, but with her poetry. I can honestly say that over the course of the last two weeks I examined each line of each poem in her book Jaguar of Sweet Laughter. This is because I have been cutting the book, line by line of poetry, into strips, which I will use in my next art project. Ackerman says, “A poem records emotions and moods that lie beyond normal language, that can only be patched together and hinted at metaphorically.” I wondered today what she would think of me dismantling her book this way. Would she understand that my deconstruction, the tearing apart of her patchwork of words, is a sort of ekphrasis?
I am fascinated by the idea of the ways in which a painting may resemble a sculpture, or how a poem may portray a painting. I have written at least two poems related to the paintings of Van Gogh, and I am currently working on a mixed media piece inspired by a statue of Cupid and Psyche that I photographed in Paris.
But would Ackerman appreciate my dissection of her work? Perhaps she would. She is, after all, the author of a book titled Deep Play, which according to her website, “considers play, creativity and our need for transcendence.” So maybe she would understand why I feel the need to play with her words.
You see, I don’t just shred her work and glue it to a panel. I cut it apart one line at a time and put it in a box. But not before reading it. And because of the way I cut the stanzas and then the lines apart, I don’t usually read the poetry in the order the poet intended it to be read. Instead, I perceive it bit by bit as I trim the now unnecessary white space away from phrases such as “to where he loves being a hermit,” “of night blooming orchids,” and “with a salmon’s purpose.” I almost never glimpse entire clauses, so when I do, they become as memorable as these bits: “he sees the world through a small tube,” “the new biography makes me a fortuneteller,” “he will be less than an inkling,” and, “we live in the outback of our art.” Sometimes my favorite bits are mere subtle images, such as, “the vicarious agony,” “an orient of light,” and “hypnotic tantrums of the surf.”
I love the absorption and shift that occurs repeatedly as I cut the poem to pieces, as I consider the variety of line lengths I encounter and the way the before unnoticed ascenders and descenders of the alphabet attempt in their tiny ways to impede my progress in the creation of what will become the equivalent of brush strokes in my new piece. (This is not the first time I have played with text. The photo at the top of this blog is a bit of background from a previous piece.)
But for this to be a true attempt at ekphrasis, my work must contain some consideration of the sentiment of the artist, or in this case, poet, when she created her work. What then will be the subject of my art piece? Perhaps part tribute. Not overtly stated, but implied. I admire the bits of Ackerman’s poems, but also the cohesive creation of each poem and the way they come together to create a volume.
Perhaps part imitation. But only in the sense that I admire her powers of observation and the way she tints her words with a naturalistic view of the world. When I started this project, I had planned to create a portrait of a pair of lovers. I have not turned away from that idea, but more and more images of trees, snakes, oceans and clouds have crept into the background as though threatening to overtake the couple.
I am feeling some sense of urgency. This is always a good thing for me as an artist when I put brush to canvas, or in this case, when I apply gel medium and paper to panel. It means that my thoughts and observations have begun to swirl into a vision that will be shared at some point in the near future. This sharing, whether through word or image, is for me what gives my life order and meaning. I agree wholeheartedly with Ackerman when she says, “I don’t want to get to the end of my life and find that I lived just the length of it. I want to have lived the width of it as well.” And so the shape of the collage is decided--a perfect square.